Competitive Comparison

How Does Your Security Stack Up?

PassMark Software is a leading authority in software and hardware performance benchmarking and testing, providing independent testing and analysis. In benchmarking security solutions, they've created 14 performance metrics for home solutions and 10 performance metrics for business solutions. These metrics include scan times, install size, and install times. Below are the results for Webroot SecureAnywhere compared to our major competitors. In both tests, Webroot SecureAnywhere is the clear leader, providing the fastest, lightest, easiest to manage security available.

Overall Score – Home Security

Highest possible score (out of 14 metrics) = 112

Product Name Overall Score
Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete 2012 102
Webroot SecureAnywhere Essentials 2012 101
Norton 360 v5 76
ESET Smart Security 5 60
Trend Maximum Security 2012 55
McAfee Total Protection 2012 51
AVG Premium Security 2012 48
Kaspersky PURE 9 46
Read the Full Report »

Overall Score – Business Security

Highest possible score (out of 10 metrics) = 80

Product Name Overall Score
Webroot SecureAnywhere Endpoint Protection 78
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12.1 Small Business 55
ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4 Business 47
Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection 46
Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8.0 40
Trend Micro Worry Free Business Security 7.0 Standard 38
McAfee Total Protection for Secure Business 29
Sophos Endpoint Security 10.0 27
Read the Full Report »

Bigger is not always better. Compare the numbers.

Home Security

Installation Size
Takes up 96% less space than Kaspersky.

This metric aims to measure a product's total installation size. This metric is defined as the total disk space consumed by all new files added during a product's installation.

Webroot® SecureAnywhere


61.02 MB

1988.34 MB

Kaspersky PURE 9

Memory Usage During System Idle
Uses 97% less memory than McAfee.

The amount of memory used while the machine is idle provides a good indication of the amount of system resources being consumed by the security software on a permanent basis. Better performing products occupy less memory while the machine is idle.

McAfee® Total Protection 2012


90.12 MB

2.64 MB

Webroot® SecureAnywhere

Initial Scan Time
Scans more than 3x faster than Kaspersky.

This metric measured the amount of time required to scan a set of clean files. The sample file set comprised a total file size of 5.44 GB and was made up of files that would typically be found on end-user machines, such as media files, system files and Microsoft Office documents.

Webroot® SecureAnywhere


20.0 SECONDS

94.0 SECONDS

Kaspersky PURE 9

Memory Usage During Initial Scan
Uses 92% less memory than Norton.

This metric measures the amount of memory (RAM) used by the product during a security scan. The total memory usage was calculated by identifying all endpoint protection software processes and the amount of memory used by each process during a security scan.

Norton 360 v5


122.25 MB

9.14 MB

Webroot® SecureAnywhere

Install Time
Installs 131x faster than
McAfee®.

This metric measured the minimum installation time it takes for Endpoint Security products to be fully functional and ready for use by the end user. Products with lower installation times are considered better performing products in this category.

McAfee® Total Protection 2012


659.10 SECONDS

5.00 SECONDS

Webroot® SecureAnywhere

Legend/Key

  • Webroot® SecureAnywhere Complete
  • McAfee Total Protection 2012
  • Norton 360 v5
  • Kaspersky PURE 9
  • ESET Smart Security 5
  • Trend Maxinum Security 2012
  • AVG Premium Security 2012
Business Security

Installation Size
Takes 141x less disk space
than Symantec®.

This metric aims to measure a product's total installation size. This metric is defined as the total disk space consumed by all new files during a product's installation.

Webroot® SecureAnywhere


3.92 MB

555.21 MB

Symantec® EP 12.1 Small Business

Memory Usage During System Idle
Uses 42x less memory than
Sophos.

The amount of memory used while the machine is idle provides a good indication of the amount of system resources being consumed by the security software on a permanent basis. Better performing products occupy less memory while the machine is idle.

Sophos Endpoint Security 10.0


163.41 MB

3.87 MB

Webroot® SecureAnywhere

Initial Scan Time
Scans more than 3x faster
than McAfee®.

This metric measured the amount of time required to scan a set of clean files. The sample file set comprised a total file size of 5.44 GB and was made up of files that would typically be found on end-user machines, such as media files, system files and Microsoft Office documents.

Webroot® SecureAnywhere


50.0 SECONDS

156.0 SECONDS

McAfee® TP for SB

Memory Usage During Initial Scan
Uses 19x less memory than
McAfee®.

This metric measures the amount of memory (RAM) used by the product during a security scan. The total memory usage was calculated by identifying all endpoint protection software processes and the amount of memory used by each process during a security scan.

McAfee® TP for SB


233.08 MB

12.30 MB

Webroot® SecureAnywhere

Install Time
Installs more than 53x faster than Kaspersky.

This metric measured the minimum installation time it takes for Endpoint Security products to be fully functional and ready for use by the end user. Products with lower installation times are considered better performing products in this category.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8.0


292.1 SECONDS

5.45 SECONDS

Webroot® SecureAnywhere

Legend/Key

  • Webroot® SecureAnywhere
  • McAfee TP for SB
  • Microsoft FEP 2010
  • Sophos Endpoint Security 10.0
  • Symantec® EP 12.1 Small Business
  • Kaspersky Endpoint Security 8.0
  • ESET NOD32 Antivirus 4 Business
  • Trend Micro WFBS 7.0 Standard